The Significance of Blind Tasting
After his introduction the tasting began. Given 30 minutes for 6 wines, we plowed through each, picking up on all the nuances they had to offer, jotting down tasting notes, and assigning a numerical score from 1 to 6 with 1 being our favorite and 6 being our least. The hardest part about this was not to figure out which were good and which weren’t, but to pick out only 1 as our favorite. They were all fantastic! We finished, he tallied the scores, and out came the results.
In order from least favorite to the wine of the night from all 25 panelists:
Wine#6: ‘05 Chateau St. Jean Cinq Cepages-Retails around $50; critic review:88pts
Wine #5: ‘05 Dominus Estate-Retails around$130; critic reviews 89pts and 95pts
Wine #4:’05 Valley of the Moon Cuvee de la Luna-Retails around $28; no critic reviews
Wine #3: ‘05 Cain Winery Cain 5-Retails around $100; no critic reviews
Wine #2: ‘05 Opus One-Retails around $175; critic reviews 90pts and 95pts
Wine #1: ‘05 Flora Springs Trilogy-Retails around $65; critic reviews 82pts and 93pts
As you can see, a great lineup without a bad one in the bunch. Results were unanimous from to to bottom. You may also note the gap between some of the critic’s scores. Any relevance to the last article written? I think this clearly shows when you gather a group of people with a group of wines that are unknown, the honest opinion shines through. Points aside, names aside, and most importantly, price aside, these all were fantastic wines. This is the significance of blind tasting.
For my complete tasting notes on these 6 wines, please visit http://www.cellartracker.com/event.asp?iEvent=6859.
*All wines were provided by Mr. Crane for this comparative venue. The wines were opened and poured by 3 neutral tasters not participating in the event. Dollar value given to the wines were taken from local market value as well as a national average.

????? ???? ??????, ??-?????, ??? ????????. ?? ?? ????????? ???????? ? google.com?…
?????????? ?? ???????? ……